F. M. Alexander

Make room to choose how you begin an action.

Life and work

F. M. Alexander investigated how he used his body in speaking and movement. In The Use of the Self, difficulties during recitation lead him to examine the relationship between his head, neck and back. His teaching examines how you organize an activity as well as the result you want.

Approach and technique

Alexander uses inhibition in a particular sense. In excerpts from his writings, he describes choosing not to make a habitual response to a stimulus. That interval allows another way of proceeding to be considered. You are studying the beginning of an action, where the familiar response may already be taking shape.

The excerpts also distinguish preventing an unwanted response from forcing the body in the opposite direction. Alexander cautions that an eager attempt to correct yourself can repeat the pattern you are trying to change. In rehearsal, this gives you a useful question: are you making a fresh choice, or adding another effort to the same old preparation? The answer begins with attention to what you actually do.

A performer examining the act of preparation

You can trace Alexander’s work to his experience as a reciter in Australia. Born in Tasmania in 1869, he began investigating his own preparation for speaking during the early 1890s. He taught elocution, worked in Melbourne and Sydney, and moved to London in 1904. His inquiry broadened into the approach now known as the Alexander Technique.

His books include Man’s Supreme Inheritance, Constructive Conscious Control of the Individual, The Use of the Self and The Universal Constant in Living. In 1931 he began a three-year teacher training course. You encounter both a performer’s account of inquiry and a teaching tradition that developed beyond its founder’s own practice.

The means of an action

You can follow Alexander’s central inquiry through the opening account in The Use of the Self. A desired result in recitation led him to investigate the organization accompanying his attempt. The attention moves from what he wanted to achieve toward what he was doing in pursuit of it. This relationship between an end and the means of approaching it runs through his writing.

Inhibition has a technical meaning in that inquiry. You encounter the possibility of declining an immediate habitual response, leaving room for another course of action. The term does not mean suppressing your dramatic feeling or making performance timid. It concerns the interval in which an intention is already organizing the way you proceed.

Alexander’s distinction between preventing an unwanted response and forcing its opposite is especially relevant to craft. A correction can become another version of the same determined effort. You can understand why noticing the preparation matters before imposing a new result. The inquiry asks you to become more exact about what you do, including the response that arrives when you try to improve it.

What does this add to actor training? You already work on ends: reaching a partner, completing an action, making a thought clear. Alexander directs attention toward the use of yourself within those pursuits. An entrance or a line can have a familiar preparation that deserves study even when the result seems successful. The work gives you another level at which to understand a habit.

The development from recitation to teaching and teacher training also places the technique in a longer history. You encounter a performer’s account that became a professional educational practice, with books extending the inquiry beyond a single task. For your reading, the strongest connection to acting remains concrete: intention, preparation and action belong to the same event. You can study the relationship among them without treating a prescribed appearance as the final measure of good use.

Applications for actors

You take patient observation into instrumental work. Before a line or an entrance, notice the preparation that arrives with the intention. You can allow a little time to choose the next action while keeping your interest in the scene and the person you address.

Rehearsal exercise

Choose a short line you know well and sit or stand comfortably. Think of saying it, then allow yourself to wait for a moment. Notice any impulse to rush, tighten your hands or arrange a familiar expression. There is no need to diagnose or correct what you notice.

Let the room and your imagined partner come into your attention. Choose whether to say the line now, wait a little longer or make a small easy movement first. Try the experiment again, keeping your breath ordinary. Compare the preparations without demanding an improved result.

Books and further study

Read Alexander’s passages on inhibition alongside his account of how he developed the technique. The Use of the Self, first published in 1932, offers Alexander’s account of the development of his technique; the publisher explains the edition history and the opening chapter, “Evolution of a Technique.” As you study, separate the particular observations from the broader claims surrounding them. A teacher’s language can suggest a question to investigate. Your rehearsal still needs a concrete action, an available choice and attention to what the scene asks of you.

Related reading

Instrument, Observation, Relaxation.

Explore Alexander’s life and writing at Mouritz.

Previous
Previous

Joan Littlewood

Next
Next

Moshe Feldenkrais